Did you happen to catch the CNN.com article, “Forgive us, father; we’d rather go online” last week? The article looks at sites such as mysecret.tv (a product of LifeChurch.tv) and ivescrewedup.com (a product of Flamingo Road Church – remember mynakedpastor.com?). Both sites allow users to anonymously post their most heinous sins (sex, lying, cheating, addiction, etc.), to “come clean, get real, and to take a first step toward the freedom that can be found in genuine confession,” according to the MySecret About page.
The CNN article notes that the Catholic Church officially opposes online confession as a means of protecting the in-person sacrament of confession. Given that LifeChurch.tv and Flamingo Road are Protestant churches, my guess is that they are introducing confession to a different audience than the one currently served by the Catholic Church. Along those lines, I sincerely hope priests don’t feel threatened by the Confession 2.0 trend.
However, I can identify with some of the criticisms verbalized by Father Ricardo Bailey in the article. Absent from Confession 2.0 sites is a conversation. Posters post, readers read. Posters may decide to take another step, contact the church, and get the counsel need. Or, they might go on about their lives. Readers might decide to take another step by committing to pray for a confessor or committing to reach out to the hurting people they know. Or they might become voyeurs, scanning page after page of sordid tales just for the thrill of it.
For the record, I like it when churches get creative. I like it when churches leverage online technology. I like it when churches tackle tough issues. However, I’m beginning to think that while sites like these are amazing starting places/entry points/onramps, they are just that. I’m beginning to think that for sites like these to be considered successful, they have to generate more than just millions of hits.
Have you taken a look at mysecret.tv or ivescrewedup.com? If so, what do you think?