Should You Become an IMAG Church?

| By Trent Armstrong | Found in Video | 7 Comments

Jon Acuff onstage at Echo 2011

I was reminded recently of a conversation I had with some folks at Echo 2009 about their church moving to an IMAG (Image Magnification) production for their Sunday services. We talked excitedly for a long time about the reasons for doing so and the ramifications of such a big decision. I think I remember actually taking the stance that they should not consider using IMAG, and I was wrong in not simply helping them ask the right questions and come to their own conclusions instead of my conclusions.

To be clear, when I say IMAG, I’m not talking about just using video screens during your services. I am referring to the projection of your speaker’s face on the screen during his or her talk. With video cameras, projectors, and production equipment becoming a little more financially attainable, I wanted to take some time to go back and do what I should have done then — just prompt you with some of the questions and considerations that will help you come to your own conclusion.

WHY?
The first big question to ask is, “Why does my church want or need to use IMAG?”  I make a distinction there because I hear from time to time that there is simply a push from somewhere in the church to do IMAG. No matter what it is your church is considering it’s always good to keep that question in mind. ”Because we want to,” can color the rest of your answers in a way that might be unhealthy.

However, it is very important to evaluate the need. There might even be some pastors who would consider it silly to put themselves on a big screen — that is until they discover that 25 percent of their congregation feels disconnected from the sermon because they can’t see from the back and they can’t find seats closer to the front.

Once you work through the answer to the “Why?” question you will be empowered to either shut down the conversation or power through with purpose.

SUPPORT
Before moving to the tech side of things it is imperative to consider the human element. Without someone to operate the equipment with some level of competency week in and week out, the question of To IMAG or Not To IMAG is not even relevant.

As someone who directed live church broadcast and IMAG services for a number of years, I will tell you that you need people who are dedicated and passionate. The dedication means they will show up consistently. The passion means they will care about the product enough to perform well and even improve their skills over time.

I have heard it said that “Sunday comes with alarming regularity.” Considering the number of volunteers, training, and the amount of time asked of each person each week will help you in your decision.

Also, how well a camera is operated might not seem like a big issue. Your audience may not consider themselves experts on television production, but they are!  They see it every day from folks who are the best at what they do. Someone in your audience might not be able to pinpoint an awkward transition or bad framing, but they will subconsciously know something is wrong. Therefore, if your church’s production is not up to a minimum standard, it will be a distraction — more of a hinderance than a help.

When answering the questions of who and how well they might do, be realistic but don’t call it quits too quickly. While I was the Media Director at First Baptist Church Tuscaloosa, AL back in the late 1990s — just for fun — I started letting a group of junior high boys experiment with the video equipment. Of course, I supervised them, but I let them get on the headsets and switcher and run camera for each other before services. Some of them showed amazing aptitude and focus! I actually ended up using a few of them to run camera for a few things. They had some important things working their favor: they were going to be there every week, they were really excited to learn the equipment, and they pushed on each other to become better operators. It was a neat experience seeing them develop into little production rats and from what seemed to be a very unlikely place — the junior high ministry.

One last thing to think about here is the option of compensation. In the business world there is a cost associated with the combination of skill and time. It’s not uncommon for churches to actually hire camera operators in order to maintain consistency in production quality and commitment. At that point, though, expectations go way up, so it’s necessary for the person in charge of that ministry to set and monitor those expectations and be willing to treat the operators like employees and not like volunteers.

FACILITY
I have some good news and some bad news. Good news: I went to a Worship & Arts Conference a few years ago. Bad news: The only practical information I remember is that audience members who are more than 90 feet from the speaker should probably have IMAG so they can see what’s going on.

That is not to say that facilities where everyone is within 90 feet should not have IMAG. It’s just another important thing to consider. When there is an IMAG screen available for people to look at, they will almost always look at the screen instead of the live speaker. Most pastors convey their message with their whole body and not their face alone so it would seem that anyone not looking at the pastor “live” might miss something he or she would have caught if the screen were not an option.

Something else to consider is whether introducing cameras into your facility will be a distraction. Will a camera and operator block the line of site of a significant portion of your audience? Will a camera operator be so prominently displayed that he or she is certain to be a distraction? Can someone be tucked away or positioned well enough that they won’t even be noticed?

EQUIPMENT
It’s important to ask if your church can financially sustain an IMAG production. I am reasonably confident that with a $100 in cables and maybe the purchase of a video card, many churches that already have screens and a video camera could just jump right in to IMAG. But however exciting that frugality may seem, it is unlikely that making a little jump to IMAG will produce results that are worthy of being on your screens. I think it is necessary to actually do the research and talk to folks who install the necessary equipment in churches to ensure you are doing things the right way.

Though this will typically cost more, it will set your ministry up for success.  Finding someone who does this for a living buys experience as much as anything.  You will likely have pitfalls and technical issues that this person has already encountered and overcome.  That can be priceless.

So the questions to ask are Can we afford the equipment? and Can we afford to sustain the equipment?

Cameras die or mysteriously disappear. Good tripods are crazy expensive. Wiring may wear out over time. And it might be necessary to install more lighting to improve the shooting conditions. I’ll be interested to read in the comments about any other unforeseen expenses you have had when setting up IMAG for your own church.

THE BASIC QUESTIONS
Good on you if you actually read this thing!  If you just skipped here to the end, you are a very efficient person and should also be commended.

Just as a recap, here are the questions you should start with when considering IMAG as an option for your church.

  • Why would we need to use IMAG?
  • Do we have enough skilled and passionate volunteers to maintain this portion of our ministry?  Can we train each person to competency?
  • Can we afford to pay our camera operators?
  • Does our facility warrant the use of IMAG?
  • Can we introduce a camera station to the auditorium in a way that keeps distraction to a minimum?
  • Do we have the appropriate equipment or can we afford to purchase that equipment at this time?

 

Trent Armstrong is a Creative Producer for Igniter Media. Follow him on Twitter: @AETrent

  • Adam

    And all the good techs said… AMEN!

  • http://www.facebook.com/nicholasrivero Nick Rivero

    Thanks for the fair-sided post. A lot of people (including myself) have a one sided stance towards why or why not.

  • Pamela Mintari

    I love your idea of including the junior high kids. We have a school on our campus which has regular mid-week chapels and school programs in our worship center. These programs draw parents, grandparents and other relatives to our campus who may not attend our church. We were having a having a terrible time trying to staff all these functions with our Sunday volunteers. Several years ago our technical director and I began offering a twice weekly technical arts class during the elective hour in order to train students to run these programs.

    Acceptance into the class is by interview only with the kids and their parents. The importance of maturity and focus is stressed because of the value of the equipment with which they’ll be working. We accept 11-13 kids in 6th-8th grade each year. They completely run their chapels and school programs with the minimal supervision and fill every position including director, switcher, sound 1, sound 2, lights, cameras, ProPresenter op, and stage hand. The kids are required to serve on the church tech team once a month in order to get a “feel” for running the equipment in front of 1200 adults vs. 400 children, plus it offers additional training time with mentoring adults.

    Another perk…it gives all the kids who aren’t necessarily athletically inclined (although we do have some athletes) a place to flourish and use their God-given gifts.

  • http://echohub.com/ Scott McClellan

    I love that strategy, Pamela. Thanks for sharing!

  • Trent

    That is fantastic, Pamela!! What kind of success stories do you have?!

  • Pamela Mintari

    About half of our kids continue to serve on our church tech team even after they move on to high school and it’s no longer a class requirement. The high schools they attend receive students who’ve already learned to operate state of the art equipment, so our kids have stepped into leadership roles there. Those who excel and are the most responsible are allowed to work paid functions such as weddings and community functions held in our worship center, so it becomes financially beneficial for them.

    Like I said before, it’s been most rewarding when you watch a kid who had trouble participating in any other type of sport or elective (choir, band, drama, etc.) just soar because they’ve found their place. We’ve even seen them improve in other studies because of the confidence they’ve gained in tech class.

    The class has its challenges, but the rewards have definitely outweighed them, especially when we don’t have to call on already weary Sunday volunteers to cover midweek day and evening functions for the school. Plus we have the extra hands of the tech class to call on for Sundays and busy holiday seasons.

  • Trent

    I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS!!! Thank you, Pamela!!